stopping distance), Pirelliо P ZERO PZ4 (112.9 ft. stopping distance), Continentalо ExtremeContact TM Sport (108.5 ft. stopping distance) versus the Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position (112.6 ft. (4) Based on internal wet braking tests from 50 mph to 0 mph comparing the MICHELIN ® PILOT ® Sport 4 S (97.0 ft. lap time) in tire size 235/35ZR19 91Y using a 2015 BMW 328i. lap time), and Goodyear ® Eagle ® F1 Asymmetric 3 (38.52 sec. lap time), Pirelliо P ZERO PZ4 (39.42 sec. lap time), Continentalо ExtremeContact TM Sport (38.87 sec. lap time) versus the Bridgestoneо Potenza S-04 Pole Position (38.65 sec. (3) Based on internal wet circuit lap time tests comparing the MICHELIN ® PILOT ® Sport 4 S (37.23 sec. stopping distance) in tire size 235/35ZR19 91Y using a 2015 BMW 328i. stopping distance), and Goodyear® Eagle® F1 Asymmetric 3 (115.2 ft. stopping distance), Pirelliо P ZERO PZ4 (118.3 ft. stopping distance), Continentalо ExtremeContact TM Sport (115.9 ft. stopping distance) versus the Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position (119.4 ft. (2) Based on internal dry braking tests from 60 mph to 0 mph comparing the MICHELIN ® PILOT ® Sport 4 S (106.0 ft. lap time), and Goodyearо Eagleо F1 Asymmetric 3 (40.44 sec. lap time), Pirelliо P ZERO PZ4 (40.24 sec. lap time), Continentalо ExtremeContact TM Sport (40.03 sec. lap time) versus the Bridgestoneо Potenza S-04 Pole Position (40.70 sec. (1) Based on internal dry circuit lap time tests comparing the MICHELIN ® PILOT ® Sport 4 S (39.25 sec.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |